Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Indivisible Education

The other day I was talking with my sister about my school – First Foundations Academy LLC.  She was giving me feedback on what I had put together and suggested that maybe I not put such a heavy emphasis on teaching values and religious viewpoint and instead focus more on the academic aspect.  Saying that many parents may feel uncomfortable allowing their children to be taught those things away from home, and they probably felt that was more of their responsibility than the schools.

At first, I tried to explain that academics is the major aspect of the school however the form she was looking at (an explanation of FFAL philosophy) was outlining the worldview the academics would be coming from and the desired outcome of the students.  You know, like all good beginnings - The WHY or ‘start with the end in mind’ objective of the child’s education.  The purpose of their academic study was not only to give them cultural literacy and the ability to compete in the world but to help the student establish those first foundations of faith and the character necessary to experience genuine happiness while become a positive contributing member of society. 



She was still trying to compartmentalize them as separate objectives, when it finally dawned on me – She thinks they CAN be separated. 

And even worse, she thinks they had been separated in her and her children’s education experience.  I guess the discovery of their union had happened so gradually and over a span of time, I’d forgotten when I was operating under the same pretense. 

There was, however, a time I recall when I actively chose to use resources that were explicitly “valueless” or free from a religious point of view, thinking I didn’t want my children to be unfairly influenced by someone else’s agenda – so I wanted the information to be strictly and only… knowledge. 

I believe it wasn’t until I learned how the founding fathers viewed the importance of education [in the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 - Article 3] as necessary for good government and mankind’s happiness, that I began seeing it differently.  They said that schools and education are comprised of three components.

1) Religion
2) Morals
3) Knowledge

At first I thought that was their planning strategy – to include all three of those components – but as I began observing one area, I noticed that it actually internally possessed the other two.  Maybe not as visibly as one might think, but it was there. 

Learning a religion - it always had moral training along with knowledge.  Moral training - included a religious viewpoint and is taught through knowledge.  And the same thing came with secular knowledge.  If a subject appears to be devoid of a religion – it would fall into an atheistic or humanistic viewpoint (even the courts ruled this as a religion).  If it appears to be without any moral message – you got it.  That was the moral training taking place. 

And because knowledge appears to be absent of religion and morals, like it is simply barebone information – it’s easy to assume they can be separated.  The campaign to learn academics at school and religion and morals in the home is really a way of promoting a dual training (which leads to confusion, I might add) to be trained in atheism and/or humanism for six to eight hours a day and a small token of time on the family’s preferred moral/religion at dinnertime and the weekends.  And we all know how with homework, friends, media, and other outside influences, it is probably even less time than that. 



It’s no wonder so many are struggling with “cognitive dissonance” and feeling they have to abandon their faith in order to come to any peace of mind.  If so much of what they see and experience is understood as being “without God” and very little learning involves “with God” it is not a holistic or consistent worldview. 

So yes, First Foundations Academy LLC, focuses on the first foundations of (1) Religion (2) Morals & (3) Knowledge.  It strives to identify “What is Truth?” within those components in a unified mindset rather than a cynical or contradictory approach. The difference between this school and say public school, is the philosophy is right out front and center – so parents can see exactly what religion and morals are attached to the knowledge.